BodyText4
“The SNF Ithaca Initiative has the potential to transform how people on our campuses, and ultimately citizens of our country, are able to work together despite differences and collectively impact and address the critical issues we all face,” newly appointed SNF Chair of Civil Discourse Timothy J. Shaffer said. He started the dialogue by framing civil discourse within the broader context of the state of democracy.
“We often think about civil discourse as politeness, but we must also think about it as responsiveness to others and to our shared challenges, embracing a ‘strong’ form of civil discourse that includes dialogue, deliberation, and deep listening, as well as protest and civil disobedience,” Shaffer said. “We need to recognize that ideas about how we’re supposed to talk can sometimes hold us back from why we should engage others, especially when we have deep differences.”
Following the Biden School’s successful SNF Ithaca National Civil Discourse Summit in fall 2021, April’s dialogue sought to inspire and equip students and administrators alike to return to their institutions with the knowledge and skills necessary to navigate conflict using civil discourse, as well as implement and adapt solutions based on their newfound experience.
“Students at the dialogue shared insights and learned new perspectives from one another that will help carry them forward in this work and further the goals of civil discourse and civic engagement, including how to identify and determine stakeholder groups they should bring together to address challenges and how to foster healthy relationships for productive problem-solving,” Shaffer said. “Approaching civil discourse through the lens of public policy allowed students to walk away with names to call and steps to take to address the real challenges facing their campuses.”
SNF Ithaca Student Leader Samiyah Sherman introduced a case study on civil discourse during the event.
“It meant a lot for me to participate in this dialogue with so many students from all over the country,” Sherman said. “By leading my individual session … I saw how well my peers understood the [content]. I believe that by participating in the dialogue, students were able to see how civil discourse works and how they could use it in other settings.”